![]() |
Pecan |
C. Owen Plank and C. C. Mitchell |
None established.
Sample the middle pair of leaflets from the mid-portion of terminal growth 56 to 84 days after catkin fall. The sampling time will vary among states, but in Georgia and Alabama the preferred sampling time is from July 7 to August 7. Under normal conditions, rainfall is frequent enough to keep leaf surfaces fairly free from dust and soil particles. If the leaflets are contaminated with residues from foliar sprays, they should be washed in a mild detergent solution (0.30%) and rinsed in a water bath or running water. Do not prolong the washing procedure or allow the plant material to "stand" in either the washing or rinsing solutions.
| Macronutrients | |||||
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | S |
| 2.50–3.30% § | 0.12–0.30% | 0.75–2.50% | 0.70–1.75% | 0.30–0.60% | 0.20–0.50% |
| § If irrigated, the optimum range is 2.80–3.00%. For the 'Desirable' variety, the sufficiency range is 2.30–3.00%. | |||||
| Micronutrients | ||||
| Fe | Mn | Zn | Cu | B |
| 50–300 ppm | 100–800 ppm | 50–100 ppm | 6–30 ppm | 15–50 ppm |
| Nutrient Ratio | Mean | CV (%) | Nutrient Ratio | Mean | CV (%) |
| N § | 27.2 | 9.4 | Mn | 324 | 54.5 |
| P | 1.4 | 18.1 | Zn | 126 | 60.0 |
| K | 10.2 | 20.9 | Cu | 9.69 | 32.4 |
| Ca | 14.5 | 33.4 | Mo | 6.3 | 28.1 |
| Mg | 3.82 | 29.9 | B | 40.1 | 34.7 |
| Fe | 89.4 | 40.9 | Al | 1380 | 34.3 |
| N/P | 19.8 | 18.2 | Ca/Zn | 0.168 | 75.4 |
| N/K | 2.74 | 20.9 | Ca/Cu | 1.62 | 47.8 |
| N/Ca | 2.44 | 130.0 | Ca/Mo | 2.27 | 29.2 |
| N/Mg | 7.74 | 36.7 | Ca/B | 0.325 | 41.6 |
| N/Fe | 0.349 | 36.4 | Ca/Al | 0.0109 | 135.0 |
| N/Mn | 1.107 | 47.4 | Mg/Fe | 0.0518 | 45.2 |
| N/Zn | 0.306 | 76.5 | Mg/Mn | 0.0158 | 58.3 |
| N/Cu | 3.13 | 41.0 | Mg/Zn | 0.0438 | 71.9 |
| N/Mo | 4.56 | 28.0 | Mg/Cu | 0.470 | 49.4 |
| N/B | 0.746 | 40.2 | Mg/Mo | 0.565 | 42.9 |
| N/Al | 0.0257 | 138.0 | Mg/B | 0.111 | 45.0 |
| P/K | 0.143 | 25.4 | Mg/Al | 0.00389 | 155.0 |
| P/Ca | 0.123 | 117.0 | Fe/Mn | 0.354 | 46.0 |
| P/Mg | 0.414 | 46.5 | Fe/Zn | 1.04 | 91.7 |
| P/Fe | 0.0175 | 32.0 | Fe/Cu | 9.98 | 42.9 |
| P/Mn | 0.00535 | 41.3 | Fe/Mo | 18.6 | 45.8 |
| P/Zn | 0.0164 | 76.4 | Fe/B | 2.77 | 46.5 |
| P/Cu | 0.163 | 38.9 | Fe/Al | 0.0958 | 149.0 |
| P/Mo | 0.301 | 25.6 | Mn/Zn | 3.23 | 83.6 |
| P/B | 0.0412 | 40.0 | Mn/Cu | 35.4 | 56.6 |
| P/Al | 0.00143 | 154.0 | Mn/Mo | 70.0 | 45.3 |
| K/Ca | 0.948 | 151.0 | Mn/B | 10.2 | 65.0 |
| K/Mg | 2.97 | 46.3 | Mn/Al | 0.328 | 171.0 |
| K/Fe | 0.134 | 35.9 | Zn/Cu | 14.8 | 57.6 |
| K/Mn | 0.0409 | 50.7 | Zn/Mo | 21.5 | 54.7 |
| K/Zn | 0.121 | 77.3 | Zn/B | 3.69 | 66.5 |
| K/Cu | 1.23 | 41.7 | Zn/Al | 0.125 | 183.0 |
| K/Mo | 1.86 | 32.4 | Cu/Mo | 1.70 | 41.1 |
| K/B | 0.319 | 53.6 | Cu/B | 0.276 | 43.8 |
| K/Al | 0.0104 | 137.0 | Cu/Al | 1.00954 | 148.0 |
| Ca/Mg | 4.13 | 42.0 | Mo/B | 0.183 | 71.5 |
| Ca/Fe | 0.193 | 54.2 | Mo/Al | 0.00586 | 159.0 |
| Ca/Mn | 0.0583 | 58.5 | B/Al | 0.0384 | 170.0 |
| § N, P, K, Ca and Mg expressed in g/kg (parts per thousand); other elements in mg/kg (ppm). | |||||
The sufficiency ranges given above were taken from Plank (1989). The ranges have been developed over the past 25–30 years utilizing research data from various sources, surveys, and plant analysis summaries.
Beverly RB, Worley RE. 1992. Preliminary DRIS diagnostic norms for pecan. HortScience 27(3):271.
Plank CO. 1989. Plant analysis handbook for Georgia. Athens (GA): University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. 64 p.
Sparks D. 1976. Magnesium nutrition and the pecan—a review. Pecan South 3(3):384–7.
Sparks D. 1977. Methods of predicting the nutrient needs of nut trees. [place unknown]: Northern Nut Growers Association. 68th Annual Report. p 25–30.
Sparks D. 1977. Nitrogen—re-evaluation of its effects on pecan yield and nut growth. Pecan South 4(May/June):16–9.
Sparks D. 1978. Nutrient concentrations of pecan leaves with deficiency symptoms and normal growth. HortScience 13(3):256–7.
Sparks D. 1978. Predicting the nutrient needs of pecan—a review. Pecan South 5(6):280–4.
Sparks D. 1993. Threshold leaf levels of zinc that influence nut yield and vegetative growth in pecan. HortScience 28(11):1100–2.
Worley RE. 1974. Effect of N, P, K and lime on yield, nut quality, tree growth, and leaf analysis of pecan (Carya illinoensis W.). J Am Soc Hort Sci 99:49–57.
Worley RE. 1985. Use of leaf analysis for basing N application for Stuart pecans. Proc SE Pecan Growers Assoc 78:79–83.
Electronic Document Prepared by:
Catherine Stokes, Communication Specialist
Agronomic Division of the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. July 2000.