None established.
Sample the top 4 to 6 inches of the plant prior to or at 1/10 bloom stage.
| Macronutrients | |||||
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | S |
| 3.00–5.00% | 0.25–0.70% | 2.00–3.50% | 0.80–3.00% | 0.25–1.00% | 0.25–0.50% |
| Micronutrients | ||||
| Fe | Mn | Zn | Cu | B |
| 30–250 ppm | 25–100 ppm | 20–70 ppm | 4–30 ppm | 20–80 ppm |
| Important Ratios |
| Maintain the N:S ratio between 10:1 and 15:1 for ruminant nutrition. |
| Expression | Norms § | CV (%) | Expression | Norms § | CV (%) |
| (N/DM) × 100 | 2.952 | 7.2 | (Ca/DM) × 100 | 1.186 | 13.1 |
| N/P | 12.450 | 19.1 | Mg/Ca | 0.1365 | 23.1 |
| N/K | 1.499 | 18.2 | Zn/Ca | 18.27 | 24.7 |
| N/Ca | 2.534 | 11.6 | Cu/Ca | 7.097 | 19.3 |
| Mg/N | 0.0550 | 22.6 | B/Ca | 34.06 | 20.7 |
| N/Zn | 0.1504 | 24.5 | (Mg/DM) × 100 | 0.1609 | 19.2 |
| N/Cu | 0.4583 | 26.1 | Zn/Mg | 132.60 | 31.5 |
| B/N | 15.09 | 19.6 | Cu/Mg | 43.96 | 28.0 |
| (P/DM) × 100 | 0.2435 | 15.5 | B/Mg | 279.50 | 23.7 |
| P/K | 0.1240 | 23.8 | (Zn/DM) × 106 | 21.44 | 49.8 |
| P/Ca | 0.2163 | 23.8 | Cu/Zn | 0.3462 | 29.0 |
| Mg/P | 0.6722 | 21.3 | Zn/B | 0.4967 | 47.4 |
| Zn/P | 90.45 | 55.6 | (Cu/DM) × 106 | 6.886 | 26.6 |
| Cu/P | 28.68 | 27.8 | B/Cu | 7.048 | 37.7 |
| B/P | 185.40 | 26.2 | (B/DM) × 106 | 44.18 | 17.9 |
| (K/DM) × 100 | 2.034 | 19.1 | |||
| K/Ca | 1.938 | 19.3 | |||
| Mg/K | 0.0831 | 31.9 | |||
| K/Zn | 0.1026 | 27.0 | |||
| Cu/K | 3.431 | 15.5 | |||
| B/K | 23.13 | 33.7 | |||
| § Concentrations of N, P, K, Ca and Mg are expressed in dekagrams per kilogram and those of Zn, Cu and B in milligrams per kilogram. | |||||
DRIS norms developed for some crops may vary somewhat from one geographical region to another. This is illustrated by the work of Walworth and others (1986) who showed that norms developed for alfalfa in the Midwest (Erickson and others 1982) differed significantly from those developed in Georgia. Soils in the two regions differ appreciably and are believed to account for the wide differences in Mg and B norms between the regions. Consequently, when such factors are known, they should be taken into account when selecting both DRIS norms and sufficiency ranges for interpretative purposes.
Erickson T, Kelling KA, Shulte EE. 1982. Predicting alfalfa nutrient needs through DRIS. Proc 1982 Wisconsin Fert Agric Lime Pest Mgmt Conf 21:233–46.
Kresge CB, Younts SE. 1962. Effect of various rates and frequencies of potassium application on yield and chemical composition of alfalfa and alfalfa-orchardgrass. Agron J 54:313–6.
Plank CO. 1989. Plant analysis handbook for Georgia. Athens (GA): University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. 64 p.
Walworth JL, Sumner ME, Isaac RA, Plank CO. 1986. Preliminary DRIS norms for alfalfa in the southeastern United States and a comparison with midwestern norms. Agron J 78:1046–52.
Electronic Document Prepared by:
Catherine Stokes, Communication Specialist
Agronomic Division of the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. July 2000.